mirror of
https://github.com/asimonson1125/Implementations-of-Probability-Theory.git
synced 2026-02-24 21:59:50 -06:00
Bayes Graphic
This commit is contained in:
Binary file not shown.
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
|||||||
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
||||||
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
||||||
\usepackage{amssymb}
|
\usepackage{amssymb}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
||||||
\usepackage[a4paper, total={6in, 10in}]{geometry}
|
\usepackage[a4paper, total={6in, 10in}]{geometry}
|
||||||
\usepackage{setspace}
|
\usepackage{setspace}
|
||||||
\setstretch{1.25}
|
\setstretch{1.25}
|
||||||
@@ -187,8 +188,8 @@ to assume that the sophistication of our tools overrides imperfections in the da
|
|||||||
In this unit I explored some common fallacies and assumptions held by analysts who may not fully grasp the content that they work with,
|
In this unit I explored some common fallacies and assumptions held by analysts who may not fully grasp the content that they work with,
|
||||||
nor the problems they intend to solve. This required extensive research that I found was best digested in the form of books whose chapters chronicle multiple
|
nor the problems they intend to solve. This required extensive research that I found was best digested in the form of books whose chapters chronicle multiple
|
||||||
examples of a given principle. As such, the reading was not confined to just the timeslot designated for this unit. Research started during the months leading up
|
examples of a given principle. As such, the reading was not confined to just the timeslot designated for this unit. Research started during the months leading up
|
||||||
to the start of the semester\footnote{Only research during the semester was logged in the timesheet} and have continued through the independent study. This structure was particularly helpful to pull me back and gain perspective of what
|
to the start of the semester\footnote{Only research during the semester was logged in the timesheet} and have continued through the independent study. This
|
||||||
my goal was when I was knee-deep in feature construction and model formulation.
|
structure was particularly helpful to pull me back and gain perspective of what my goal was when I was knee-deep in feature construction and model formulation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Moral Hazards and The Bob Rubin Trade}
|
\subsubsection{Moral Hazards and The Bob Rubin Trade}
|
||||||
Picking pennies in front of a steamroller.
|
Picking pennies in front of a steamroller.
|
||||||
@@ -199,8 +200,8 @@ flags for significant events in reality that do not effect the proposed course o
|
|||||||
The 2009 recession, attributed to the collapse of the housing market bubble, is the most common example of a moral hazard because the displacement of risk from
|
The 2009 recession, attributed to the collapse of the housing market bubble, is the most common example of a moral hazard because the displacement of risk from
|
||||||
banks who were federally required to give subprime loans to the taxpayer meant that banks could profit from subprime loans but would not be harmed when the inevitable
|
banks who were federally required to give subprime loans to the taxpayer meant that banks could profit from subprime loans but would not be harmed when the inevitable
|
||||||
occurred. In popular media, the housing bubble bursting is attributed to the banks where those in the industry passed off the event as something that nobody could
|
occurred. In popular media, the housing bubble bursting is attributed to the banks where those in the industry passed off the event as something that nobody could
|
||||||
have forseen.\footnote{For instance, in the 2015 movie \textit{The Big Short}, only a few savvy traders who bothered to look into the details find that banks had,
|
have foreseen\footnote{For instance, in the 2015 movie \textit{The Big Short}, only a few savvy traders who bothered to look into the details find that banks had,
|
||||||
in their ignorance, built the bundled mortgages on an unstable foundation.} In reality, banks only ignored a probablistic eventuality because their models did not
|
in their ignorance, built the bundled mortgages on an unstable foundation.}. In reality, banks only ignored a probablistic eventuality because their models did not
|
||||||
need to account for such an event.
|
need to account for such an event.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Most emphasize the problems with risk transferrence when creating models. For this study's purposes, the important learning is that probablistic models should not
|
Most emphasize the problems with risk transferrence when creating models. For this study's purposes, the important learning is that probablistic models should not
|
||||||
@@ -291,9 +292,35 @@ Finally, this equation is updated to replace descriptions with technical terms:
|
|||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Even this equation can be misconstrued as a number of arrangements of ratios involving total occurrences from a category or non-occurrences from outside
|
Even this equation can be misconstrued as a number of arrangements of ratios involving total occurrences from a category or non-occurrences from outside
|
||||||
of the category so as a final demonstration, the sample space will be visualized geometrically
|
of the category so as a final demonstration, the sample space can be visualized geometrically as a 1 unit by 1 unit
|
||||||
\footnote{Concept credit to 3Blue1Brown on Youtube, this video is what finally clarified in my mind what the equation behind Bayes Theorem meant.\\
|
square\footnote{Concept credit to 3Blue1Brown on Youtube, this video is what finally clarified in my mind what the frankly simple equation behind Bayes Theorem
|
||||||
\url{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZGCoVF3YvM}} as a 1 unit by 1 unit square.
|
meant.\\\url{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZGCoVF3YvM}}. The area of this square, 1 unit squared, is the equivalent to a probability of 1 (or 100\%).
|
||||||
|
In such an example, a vertical line is drawn to separate proportions representative of the category (or the assumed-true event) and observations not of that category.
|
||||||
|
Horizontal lines drawn in each represent the probability of an occurrence in each category.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Consider an example where a cancer test given to 1,000 people has a 95\% accuracy rate. Of those 1,000 people, 10\% of them have cancer, 95 of whom test positive
|
||||||
|
(true positive) and 5 who test negative (false negative). Of the remaining 900, 45 test positive (false positive) and 855 test negative (true negative). Such
|
||||||
|
an example can be expressed visually as:
|
||||||
|
\vskip 2pt
|
||||||
|
\begin{center}
|
||||||
|
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
||||||
|
\draw[gray, thick] (0,0) rectangle (3,3);
|
||||||
|
\draw[gray, thin] (3/10, 0) -- (3/10, 3);
|
||||||
|
\draw[gray, thin] (0, 0) rectangle (3/10, 3*.95);
|
||||||
|
\node[label=below:95/1000] at (-1,1) {TP};
|
||||||
|
\draw[->] (-.6, 1) -- (.15, 1);
|
||||||
|
\node[label=below:45/1000] at (1.5,-2/3) {FP};
|
||||||
|
\draw[->] (1.5, -1/3) -- (1.5, .05);
|
||||||
|
\draw[gray, thin] (3/10, 0) rectangle (3, 3*.05);
|
||||||
|
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||||
|
\end{center}
|
||||||
|
\vskip 2pt
|
||||||
|
Using this visual where TP represents true positives and FP representing false positives, Bayes Theorem is simply expressed as:
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
P(A|E) = \frac{TP}{TP + FP} = \frac{\frac{95}{1000}}{\frac{95}{1000} + \frac{45}{1000}} = 67.9\%
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
Meaning that, given a random positive test, there is a 67.9\% chance of the patient actually having cancer. This percentage visually tracks with the graphic as
|
||||||
|
the TP box appears to be approximately twice the size of the FP box, giving a two-thirds chance of the patient being a true positive.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Bayesian Updating}
|
\subsubsection{Bayesian Updating}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -22,4 +22,5 @@ Week,Date,Type,Duration (Hours),Description
|
|||||||
7,10/11,Advising Meetings,1,"Epistemology and Overview discussion, hex mapping"
|
7,10/11,Advising Meetings,1,"Epistemology and Overview discussion, hex mapping"
|
||||||
8,10/15,Research,3,"Bayes Belief Networks"
|
8,10/15,Research,3,"Bayes Belief Networks"
|
||||||
8,10/16,Application,2.5,"Bayes visualizations and practice worksheets"
|
8,10/16,Application,2.5,"Bayes visualizations and practice worksheets"
|
||||||
8,10/16,Reporting,2,"Early Bayesian Statistics Report"
|
8,10/16,Reporting,2,"Early Bayesian Statistics Report"
|
||||||
|
8,10/17,Application,2,"Bayes Geometric Visualization"
|
||||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@@ -80,13 +80,15 @@ Week & Date & Type & Duration (Hours) & Description \\
|
|||||||
\hline
|
\hline
|
||||||
8 & 10/16 & Reporting & 2 & Early Bayesian Statistics Report \\
|
8 & 10/16 & Reporting & 2 & Early Bayesian Statistics Report \\
|
||||||
\hline
|
\hline
|
||||||
|
8 & 10/17 & Application & 2 & Bayes Geometric Visualization \\
|
||||||
|
\hline
|
||||||
\end{tabular}
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
\noindent Hours for Advising Meetings: 6.0\\
|
\noindent Hours for Advising Meetings: 6.0\\
|
||||||
Hours for Application: 4.0\\
|
Hours for Application: 6.0\\
|
||||||
Hours for Reporting: 16.0\\
|
Hours for Reporting: 16.0\\
|
||||||
Hours for Research: 28.5\\
|
Hours for Research: 28.5\\
|
||||||
\textbf{Total Hours: 54.5}\\
|
\textbf{Total Hours: 56.5}\\
|
||||||
% CLOSE Timesheet
|
% CLOSE Timesheet
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user